Claim first
A good pitch starts with the thing you want tested, not a paragraph of adjectives.
For projects
Submit a Project
Serious teams should want sharper questions.
Rabbid Hole is for founders who can put the claim on record, show the receipts, and let the public read stand on its own.
Paid sessions buy time. They never buy the verdict.
Before you DM
Bring the claim, not the campaign.
The fastest way to get a serious read is to make the test clear: what should people believe, what can be checked, and what would change the answer?
Receipts ready
Links, dates, mechanics, contracts, metrics, founder context, and the places a reader can verify.
Fit check
Not every project gets a session. There has to be enough public material and enough tension in the claim.
Editorial control
You can clarify facts. You do not pre-approve questions, framing, or the verdict.
How it works
Four steps. No velvet rope.
- Step 01
Send the claim
One short pitch. What are you building, what is live, and what claim should be tested in public?
- Step 02
We pre-read
Docs, socials, wallets, mechanics, roadmap, rights, incentives, and obvious gaps get checked before a session is agreed.
- Step 03
You sit in the chair
Dig Deep runs live. The questions are direct, not gotchas. The answers are on record, and the room can push where the pitch gets thin.
- Step 04
The file goes up
The Surface write-up names the claim, the receipts, the current read, and the verdict readers should carry forward.
What to send
Bring the receipts first.
- Project link, X, Discord, founder handles, and the best place to verify official information.
- What is already live versus what is promised.
- Chain, stage, mint date, supply, pricing, and contract details if relevant.
- Docs, deck, marketplace, repo, dashboard, or any public receipts.
- The hardest question you expect us to ask.
- Any paid, sponsored, advisory, or holdings relationship that must be disclosed.
Good fit if
You want the read, not the applause.
- There is enough public material to research.
- A founder/operator can answer live, not only through a mod or deck.
- The project can handle risks being named plainly.
- The goal is scrutiny and a useful record, not a guaranteed promo clip.
What founders can expect
Sharp, public, fair.
- E/01Questions are prepared from public material before the session.
- E/02If something factual is unclear, we may ask for clarification before publication.
- E/03The public file names the useful signal and the remaining risk in plain language.
- E/04Paid participation, where applicable, is disclosed and never buys the stamp.
What you get
A serious read.
- A hosted Dig Deep session with a prepared host who has read the project before pressing record.
- A published case file on The Surface, read by crypto-native researchers and traders who actually click through.
- Honest editorial that names risks alongside strengths and attaches a verdict you can't spin.
What you don't get
No shill thread.
- No paid hype or guaranteed positive coverage. Money buys the conversation, not the conclusion.
- No copy-paste promo posts, blind shill threads, or "we loved everything" write-ups.
- No pre-approval on questions. Founders see what we're asking when everyone else does — live, on the record.
Send the claim, the links, and the part you want tested under the lamp.